|
SREP v. SNF v. WMD/Bartons |
|
| Unknown 30?? | Decision by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals |
| February 2008 |
9th Circuit Court of Appeals Hears SREP v SNF v WMD/Bartons and Hobbs
|
| February 2007 | WMD/Bartons Final Response filed Feb 27, 2007 click here |
| February 2007 | SREP Final Response filed Feb 6, 2007 click here |
| November 2006 | Forest Service Response to SREP, WMD/Bartons, Hobbs click here |
| October 2006 |
Barton and WMD file opening brief with the 9th Circus Court in SREP vs. SNF. Read brief as .doc file. Read brief as web page.
The opening brief is dedicated to the memory of LESA Barton, who passed away in September of 2006 after a six month bout with cancer. LESA is greatly missed by all.
|
| September 2006 |
SREP files appeal of SREP vs. SNF in 9th Circus
Court. SREP continues to claim there is no conflict between MM-1 and
the mining regulations. SREP's summary argument states
that there is no conflict between MM-1 and the
forest service regulations since “MM-1 makes the threshold
decision”...
click here to
read the complete summary.. WE NEED YOUR FINANCIAL HELP WITH LEGAL EXPENSES! Click here to find out how to make donation. Read the complete filing here: Part I and Part II. (Note that these are very large PDF files) |
| April 2006 |
Judge Hogan issues final ruling in SREP vs. Siskiyou National Forest
SREP LOSES, Waldo and Barton remain moot |
| March 2006 | Judge Hogan issues partial ruling in SREP vs. Siskiyou National Forest, which confirmed Magistrate Cooney's order of 17 October, 2005 in it's entirety. Cooney's order of the17th of October struck intervener Hobbs 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 8th, 11th,12th, 13th and 14th affirmative defenses and granted Hobbs's 1st, 2nd and 3rd counterclaims. On the 8th of November, 2005, Judge Cooney issued his findings and recommendations for the case. Therefore we await Judge Hogan's further ruling on the rest of case relating to interveners Bartons |
|
January 2006 |
OREGON
MINERS ALERT! Extreme threat to
Oregon gold dredgers Oregon 700-PM Dredge Permit Court Documents The Oregon 700-PM Dredge Permit History of Recent Attacks on Dredging |
|
December 2005 |
Barton's File Objections to Judge Cooney's finding of "mootness"
"The Bartons filed these objections because neither the Forest Service nor the Magistrate Judge has accepted their positions concerning the limitations on Forest Service planning authority with respect to mining, and the Bartons and all other miners remain subject to the very real threat of continuing unlawful conduct by the Forest Service." |
|
November 2005: |
VICTORY FOR MINING! a report from WMD president Tom Kitchar |
|
November 2005: |
Judge Cooney reverses Rose and finds against SREP (pdf) |
|
July 2005: |
Latest Filings in SREP vs. Siskiyou National Forest Memo in support of motion by Barton's to strike and other relief (PDF) Barton's response to SREP's motion for Summary Judgment (PDF) |
|
June 2005: |
Final rule of the revised 36 CFR Part 228 as posted to the Federal Register (PDF) |
December 2004: |
Oregon DEQ posts rulemaking notice for
700J Dredge Permit (PDF)
|
| January 2004: | |
|
December 2003: |
|
|
December 2003: |
|
|
November 2003: |
US DOJ: Motion for Summary Dismissal of WMD Suit |
|
August 2003: |
|
|
August 2003: |
Waldo Miners File Suit |
| Last Updated on 05-Jun-2008 | |
Visitors Since 02-Dec-2003
 |
|
| Copyright © 2003 Waldo Mining District | |